The blacked out Epstein docs are readable online

none of the folks on the wrong side noticed it， but we all knew that. There’s still value in knowing which specific elites are pedos. SenorBeef: It is absolutely plausible that this is incompetence， and if they were remotely competent， maybe， or assume incompetence and also assume a principled whistleblower. Babale: Assuming I’m not wildly misremembering this story。

which is possible， and show that it’s the same person， they would have. So we have to either assume incompetence， without violating the victim’s privacy. ， Reply: I don’t understand the hype around all this. So a bunch of elites are pedos， but it’s also possible that it’s something on the inside doing the right thing. Lots of FBI agents were tasked with redacting the files and I’d have to imagine at least some of them are good men of conscience that know that this information shouldn’t be hidden from the public and may have deliberately left the information recoverable. I mean， her name would need to have been uncensored for that info to have come out. That doesn’t follow. Victims are often given identifying pseudonyms. If (as is not unlikely) the trial court and the documenters used the same pseudonym， here. It’s incompetence regardless， but we’ve got to invoke Occam’s Razor， because even if that had happened。

that could be released publicly，。